ClimatePartner logo

Preserving the rainforest, strengthening the community: improved forest management in Mexico


Mexico, Quintana Roo - Ejido X-Hazil
ClimatePartner ID: 1753
Improved Forest Management (IFM)Get to know the project

In south-east Mexico, on the Yucatán Peninsula, lies one of the most species-rich forest regions in Mesoamerica. The state of Quintana Roo is part of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor, which connects the two largest protected areas on the peninsula: the Sian Ka'an and Calakmul biosphere reserves. The region is under pressure: growing tourism is driving demand for land use changes. Infrastructure projects create uncertainty for local communities in terms of employment, security and the environment.

This is exactly where the forest management project comes in. It covers a project area of 26,256 hectares within an Ejido – Mexico's unique system of communally managed land. The community is predominantly of Maya origin and maintains traditional ways of life closely tied to the forest.

The project approach is based on improved forest management. In concrete terms, this means: selective thinning, control of stand density, reduction of fire risk through firebreaks and organised fire protection patrols, and the improvement of understocked areas. Timber extraction is limited to a maximum of 30 per cent of actual stocks. The remaining 70 per cent – young trees, natural regeneration and old seed trees – safeguards biodiversity and the long-term resilience of the forest.

The climate impact results from the forest being able to store more CO2 through the project activities described. The project area is home to 158 recorded tree species, all of which are native, with an average of 2,698 trees per hectare.

The project is deeply rooted in the community. All key decisions are made at general assemblies of the local communities. Revenue from the sale of carbon credits is channelled into social programmes, healthcare, education and ecotourism. 20 per cent of the revenue is reserved for a social fund whose use is decided by the community itself.

Project Standard
The project contributes to the the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals

Improved forest management for climate action and biodiversity 

Forests are true superheroes: they prevent desertification, purify water and air, store carbon, and are an important habitat to roughly 50 percent of all animal and plant species. Forests also play a key role in the fight against the climate crisis. Around 15 percent of global CO2 emissions result from deforestation, making forest protection one of the most cost-effective solutions to mitigate climate change. 

Improved Forest Management (IFM) aims to increase the forest's capacity to store carbon, conserve the forest and reduce greenhouse gas emissions caused by deforestation. 

Depending on the project, different IFM measures are implemented: 

  • Extended rotation: Increasing the time between harvest cycles allows trees to grow larger, accumulate more biomass, and store more carbon. 

  • Reduced-impact logging: Selective removal of individual trees preserves the forest structure, and promotes natural regeneration. 

  • Build-up of timber stock: Less wood is harvested than naturally grows back, resulting in a continuous increase of forest biomass.

  • Forest reserve: In natural forest reserves, all logging activities are entirely prohibited within a designated area. This significantly increases biomass and promotes high biodiversity.

The project aims to contribute to these United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Project facts

Climate projects generally fall into one of three groups: carbon reduction, carbon removal, or carbon avoidance. Carbon reduction projects reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced by a specific activity (e.g., improved cookstoves). Carbon removal projects remove carbon from the atmosphere by sequestering it in carbon sinks (e.g., reforestation). Carbon avoidance projects avoid greenhouse gas emissions entering the atmosphere (e.g., protecting forests from deforestation with REDD+ projects).

All climate projects are based on international standards. They set processes and requirements which carbon projects must fulfill to be recognised as a proven method of reducing carbon emissions.

Climate projects demonstrably reduce, remove, or avoid greenhouse gas emissions. This is achieved with various technologies, ranging from nature-based solutions to social impact projects and renewable energies.

Climate projects go through third-party validation and verification. Verification happens regularly after each monitoring period. A validation and verification body checks and assesses whether the values and project activities stated in the monitoring report are correct and verifies them. As with validation, visits to the project site are often part of the process.

Four criteria for projects to meet quality thresholds

01. AdditionalityA project must lead to lower carbon emissions than would have occured without the project. Additionality also means that a project relies on financing from the sale of emission reductions, as the project would otherwise not be feasible and the upfront investment would be too high for project developers.
02. Exclusion of double countingThe carbon reduction may only be counted once and may not be counted again elsewhere, so a Verified Emission Reduction is retired once it has been used. This process is recorded in official registries.
03. PermanenceThe criterion of permanence ensures that carbon reductions or removals are ongoing and do not occur just once. This guarantees a long-term benefit for the climate. The minimum duration of a project depends on the underlying project technology.
04. Audit by independent third-partiesClimate projects must be audited regularly by independent auditors such as TÜV Nord. These auditors verify that the project is in compliance with the relevant standards. They also determine the volume of carbon emissions that have actually been avoided or removed.

The life cycle of a climate project

A climate project has a set life cycle consisting of various phases, from the feasibility assessment to the retirement of Verified Emission Reductions (VERs).
Project planning phase

The project developer reviews the general feasibility of the project, the project design, and the financing. Then, the Project Design Document (PDD) is prepared, which contains all the basic information about the project, such as the objective, location, timeline, and duration.

Validation

In this phase, independent auditors examine the PDD and the information it contains. This phase often also involves field visits with on-side interviews and analyses. Auditors are accredited, impartial assessors who have to be approved by the relevant standard as a validation and verification body (VVB). TÜV Nord/Süd, S&A Carbon LLC., and SCS Global Services are examples of VVBs."

Registration

Once validated, the project can be registered with a standard such as the Verified Carbon Standard or the Gold Standard. All high-quality climate projects are based on international standards. They provide the framework for project design, construction, carbon accounting, and monitoring. Recognised standards make the climate project system and the projects themselves resilient, traceable, and credible.

Monitoring

After the climate project has been registered, the monitoring begins. Here, the project developers monitor and document the data of the project activities and progress. The duration of the monitoring phase varies from project to project: it can cover two years, but documentation over five or seven years is also possible.

Verification

At the end of each monitoring phase, a VVB checks and assesses whether the values and project activities stated in the monitoring report are correct. As with validation, visits to the project site are often part of the verification process.

Issuance of Verified Emission Reductions

Once verified, the emission reductions that were confirmed in the verification phase can be issued as VERs. The steps of monitoring, verification, and issuance of VERs are repeated regularly and are therefore considered as a cycle.

Retirement of Verified Emission Reductions

Once a VER has been used, it must be retired. This process is also reflected in the registry. If the financing of a climate project is done through ClimatePartner, the VERs are bundled in a system certified by TÜV Austria and then retired on a regular basis. This ensures that each VER can no longer be sold and is only used once, preventing double counting.

ClimatePartner logo© 2026 ClimatePartner GmbH
Follow us
InstagramNewsletterLinkedin